Selected Work

Outcomes, not case studies.

Discretion is core to Adelaide’s practice — clients are anonymized, situations described in the abstract. The outcomes, however, are real.

01
Schedule I Bank

Reframing a regulatory file the industry had given up on.

Challenge

A major Canadian bank faced a regulatory framework that, as drafted, would have imposed billions in operational cost without policy benefit. Industry-wide engagement had stalled.

Approach

Adelaide rebuilt the policy case from first principles, identified the three departments where decision authority actually sat, and led an 11-month engagement strategy with senior officials and ministerial offices.

Outcomes
  • Material amendments secured before final regulation
  • Estimated 8-figure annual cost avoidance
  • Mandate continued through three subsequent files
02
National Charity

A federal funding program restructured around the sector’s reality.

Challenge

A national charity’s core federal funding stream was set to expire with no clear renewal pathway. The department’s working assumption no longer reflected sector capacity.

Approach

Adelaide led parallel engagement with the department, central agencies, and key MPs across caucuses — coupled with a public opinion research program that tested the policy framing with informed Canadians.

Outcomes
  • Five-year renewal secured at higher funding level
  • New flexibility provisions added to program terms
  • Sector-wide coalition built and now self-sustaining
03
Energy Producer

Navigating a high-scrutiny environmental review.

Challenge

A long-cycle infrastructure project entered a politically charged review process with stakeholder opposition forming and timelines slipping.

Approach

Adelaide built an integrated stakeholder engagement and government relations strategy — quietly, project-by-project — focused on the three Indigenous nations, two provincial ministries, and one federal department whose alignment was decisive.

Outcomes
  • Approval granted within original target window
  • Two formal IBA frameworks established
  • Project remains on a stable political footing through three election cycles
04
Professional Association

A legislative review redirected mid-stream.

Challenge

A professional self-regulator faced a legislative review whose initial direction would have undermined core mandate authority. The window to influence was narrow.

Approach

Adelaide deployed a focused, principal-led engagement program — testimony, briefings, and a quiet coalition with adjacent regulators — over an 8-week sprint.

Outcomes
  • Key clauses revised in final legislation
  • Mandate authority preserved and clarified
  • New standing relationship with the responsible ministry

Adelaide does not publish client names, file specifics, or identifiable engagement details. The summaries above are composites and approximations, written to convey the shape of the work without compromising the trust under which it was done.

Tell us what you’re navigating.

A confidential conversation is the right place to begin. We’ll listen first — and tell you honestly whether we’re the right partner.